|
Definition 3 Let The problem is that the evaluation is not a morphism of local compositions in general. But in the special case which is of interest, we have this guarantee: Let Next, suppose we are given two local compositiosns ![]() the retract of which is included in a module . We then have a commutative diagram ![]() is the -dual of the canonical linear map . This construction yields a morphism Assumption 2 In the following discussion of classification, we shall tacitly assume that all module complexes of affine functions have surjective transition morphisms. (We know that this is the case for retracted function modules from resolution morphisms!) If we apply the construction from diagram (4.3) to the situation where ![]() |