|
The metric weight of the first segment in figure 68 shows a characteristic of this movement. The interplay of the instrumental parts without any caesura result in a continuous motion causing a metric weight without any clear differentiation within the highest layer24
The metric weight of the third part (measures 99-163) in figure 71 reveals in contrast to the corresponding weight of the first part a differentiation within the highest layer, due to the slowing motion towards the end of the movement. Whereas in the first part no caesura appears, we can find them in the second part at the end. For instance, onsets of notes are placed solely on the second beats of the measures 151, 155 and 160, whereas the other beats are empty. These notes’ placements cause the great metric weights on the second beats within the whole segment.
The analysis of the melody of the third segment in figure 72 on the other hand is very similar to the corresponding analysis of the first part of the movement. 4.3 Summary Third SymphonyThe inner metric analysis of the first movement reveals the opposite relation between inner and outer metric structure as in the Second Symphony: despite segments of different notated time signatures the inner metric structure allows homogeneous interpretation. Concerning the theme the mentioned discrepancy between |