|
An even more refined filtering of all chords in their partially ordered roles as ”fuzzy” representatives of a given chord is suitably described in terms of the global morphem In section 4 we give an example of this kind (but see also Noll, 1997, 1998). Remark 8 Another situation where global morphemes can be considered is the study of saturated monoids ![]() implies that the equivalence closure of splits into more than one chord as equivalence classes. The stable images of these chords ( ) under iterated application of the elements of yield the minimal local placeholders for the missing global constant tone perspectives within . The whole variety of candidates is given by collections of chords , where i runs at least over two indices between 1 and n.
4 Bridges to Hugo RiemannThe present morphological approach yields some interesting relations to ideas in Hugo Riemann’s approach to harmony (cf. Riemann, 1877, 1887). We divide them into two subsections.
4.1 Consonant and dissonant Tone PerspectivesFirst we recall that Riemann’s understanding of the consonance/dissonance dichotomy differs from the traditional one in several ways. He applies a notion of relative consonance to the relation of the dominant/subdominant triads to the tonic and he applies a notion of relative dissonance to the relations of »Terzwechsel« and »Leittonwechsel«, i.e. to the relations usually denoted by
A mathematical bridge from the counterpuntal consonance/dissonance dichotomy of intervals to Riemann’s concept we can buid as built as follows by : We encode the (directed) intervals in ![]() |