which with every vertex of  associates a functor and with every arrow associates a natural transformation between corresponding vertex functors. So  is mapped to the natural transformation  . With these notations, we can define a semiotic of forms as follows: Definition 1 A semiotic of forms is a set map defined on a subset with the following properties (i) to (iv). To ease language, we use the following notations and terminology: - An element
is called a form name, and the pair a form (if is clear, the form is identified with its name) (=type of ) (= identifier of ) (= functor or »space« of ) (= frame or »frame space« of ) (= coordinator of ) Then these properties are required: - The empty word
is not a member of - Within the coordinator of
, if , the vertices of the diagram are form names, i.e. elements of - For any vertex
of the coordinator diagram , we have - If the type
is given, we have the following for the corresponding frames: - For
and , the coordinator has exactly one vertex and no arrows, i.e. , what means that in theses cases, the coordinator is determined by a form name . Further, for , we have , and for , we have . - For
and , the coordinator is any diagram . For , we have the frame , and for , we have the frame . - For type
, the coordinator has the unique vertex , and a value for a module , or, in a more sloppy notation: .
|