factorization

or

) such that

. Indeed, one has

, which gives the following computation
Thus if
satisfies the rhythmic oddity property, proposition 1 gives
or
with
. Then
must be an asymmetric pair. Conversely, if
or
where
and
being an asymmetric pair, then no cyclic shift of
can be factorized into words with equal height.
3 Construction of asymmetric pairs
The following construction is inspired by Rauzy’s rules, which are used to define standard pairs in the construction of characteristic Sturmian words J. Berstel (2001). Consider two functions
and
from
into itself defined by

One has the following proposition.
Proof: Let
denote the smallest set of pairs of words containing
and
closed under
and
, and
the set of asymmetric pairs. We prove
by double inclusion. The first inclusion is obvious, since
contains
and
and is closed under
and
. The other inclusion is proved by induction on the integer
, where
is an asymmetric pair and
. The first case is
. Then for each pair of prefixes
of
and
, one has
and
is a pair of prefixes of
. If
, then
. This proves that if
is an asymmetric pair, then so is
. By induction,
belongs to
, which proves that
belongs to
.
The other case is
. Notice that
cannot be the first symbol of
, since
is an asymmetric pair, which implies that
cannot be a pair of prefixes of
and
. Thus
. Then for each pair of prefixes
of
and
, one has
and
where
is a pair of prefixes of
. If
, then
. This proves that if
is an asymmetric pair, then so is
. By induction,
belongs to
, which proves that
belongs to
.
Considering the free monoid
on the alphabet
, we identify the concatenation with the composition of functions. Thus any word of
is identified with a function from
into itself. It is easy to prove by induction the following properties.