One also supposes that
, which clearly induces an action by isometries on . We call the inverse image of a -orbit of a motive’s abstract motif its gestalt: ![]() , the set of gestalts is denoted by . It is evidently the disjoint union of the classes in . If is a score, then its trace in is denoted by , and the projections are denoted by , and . We have a (family of) pseudo-metric(s) with on , which is defined by ![]() Now we are ready to set forth the topological framework. For a given data set as described above, suppose that ![]() -neighborhood of . Observe that at this point we link motives of different(!) cardinalities. If our setup fulfills the inheritance property (Buteau, 1998, 2001), the system of -neighborhoods defines a base for a topology on . For example, the contour type together with the Euclidean metric fulfills the inheritance property. The space with this topology is called the motivic space, its relativization to is called the motivic space on . We now introduce a topology on ![]() |